Why We Misremember Brand Colors: What Color Memory Research Shows

By Jeffery LuStudent

You have seen some logos thousands of times and still can't mix their color. Memory research explains why, and which way the errors run.

Introduction

Some logos you have seen tens of thousands of times: on your phone, on a shelf, on the side of a van. Then On Brand hands you one with a part in the wrong color, and the shade you were sure of turns out to be somewhere you can't quite find. That is not a sign of a bad memory. It is how ordinary memory is built, and psychologists have measured it in some detail.

Seeing something is not the same as storing it

The classic study used a coin. In 1979 Raymond Nickerson and Marilyn Adams asked American adults to draw a one-cent coin from memory. Of its eight main features, the typical drawing got three right and in the right place. Shown fifteen versions of a penny, fewer than half picked the real one. Nickerson and Adams published the work in Cognitive Psychology as "Long-term memory for a common object", and the title is the point: the object was about as common as objects get.

In 2015 Adam Blake, Meenely Nazarian and Alan Castel ran the same test on a logo. They asked 85 students at UCLA to draw the Apple logo. One drew it perfectly. When the real logo was shown among altered versions, 47 percent picked it, and students who used Apple products did no better than the rest. Their confidence dropped once they had tried to draw it (Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2015).

The explanation is attention. Memory keeps what it needs to recognize a thing, and recognition needs very little. You know the logo at a glance from its outline, its letters and roughly what color it is, so nothing pushes your brain to store the rest. A logo is designed to be recognized instantly, which is exactly why nobody ever looks at it closely.

Memory colors: the shade your brain expects

Color has an extra problem: your brain has opinions about it.

Familiar things have what researchers call memory colors, the colors we expect them to be. As far back as 1960, C. J. Bartleson found that people asked to recall the colors of familiar objects chose colors that were more saturated than the real thing. Grass came back greener, brick redder.

Memory colors don't only shape recall. They bend what you see. In 2006 Thorsten Hansen and colleagues asked people to adjust a photo of a banana on a screen until it looked gray. To look gray, the banana had to be pushed slightly toward blue, because a truly gray banana still looked a little yellow to them (Nature Neuroscience, 2006).

Brand logos do the same. In 2013 Atsushi Kimura and colleagues ran the gray adjustment with food and drink logos in Japan. For the logos people knew well, the setting that looked gray was pushed away from the brand's color, so a gray logo still carried a trace of it. For logos they barely knew, there was no effect, and the more stores a brand had, the stronger the pull (PLOS ONE, 2013). A brand you know well is stored less as a measurement than as an expectation, and the expectation is more vivid than the original.

The name takes over

Colors are stored partly as words. You don't remember a logo's color as a point in color space. You remember "red", plus a vaguer impression of which red.

Experiments on short-term color memory, such as Gi-Yeul Bae and colleagues' work in 2015, find that a remembered color mixes its category with an estimate of the exact shade, and that memory pulls it toward the center of its category. Over months and years the word has even more time to win. So the colors most at risk are the ones between names: a teal that is half blue, half green; a coral between pink and orange; a magenta between pink and purple; a violet between blue and purple. Each drifts toward whichever name you happen to use for it.

Talk makes it worse. People describe brands with plain words, "the red one", "the green app", and each time the word is repeated, the shade is not.

The color was never one color

There is also a fair excuse: you never saw one color in the first place. You saw the brand on a phone at night, a laptop by a window, a cardboard box, a printed bag, a lit sign, a van in the rain. Screens differ, inks differ, and light changes everything. Your visual system corrects for the light as best it can, a trick called color constancy, but what your memory holds is a blend of all those encounters. Why brand colors look different on every screen goes through the sources of that variety.

Brands also move. Companies adjust their colors in redesigns, sometimes subtly, and an older version can sit in memory next to the new one. How logo colors have changed has examples.

Many people make the same mistake

In 2022 Deepasri Prasad and Wilma Bainbridge tested people on 40 famous logos and characters and found seven that people misremember in the same specific way, which they called the Visual Mandela Effect, after the broader Mandela effect. The Monopoly man has no monocle, and Pikachu's tail has no black tip, yet many people confidently remember both. Memory fills a gap with what seems likely, and it fills it alike in millions of heads.

Their examples are details added or lost, not exact shades. But the same logic suggests why color errors are not random: if everyone's memory leans toward the more typical, more vivid version of a color name, everyone's mistakes lean the same way.

Which way the errors run

Put the research together and you get a fairly clear forecast of how a remembered brand color differs from the real one:

  • More saturated, because memory colors are more vivid than the originals.
  • Closer to the center of its color name, because the category does much of the remembering.
  • Often lighter, if it is a deep color. A navy remembered as "blue" or a burgundy remembered as "red" gets pulled toward the typical, brighter version of that name.
  • Less certain than it feels, because recognition gives you confidence that recall hasn't earned.

What to do with this

The pattern is useful, because a bias with a known direction can be corrected. Before you touch a slider in On Brand, name the color and then name its lean: a red that leans orange, a blue that leans purple. Set saturation a little below what feels right and deep colors a little darker. Then read the reveal, which shows your color beside the real one, zoomed in: the one view of a logo everyday life never gives you. A few rounds of that, and you will start to see your own drift before you lock. How to get better at On Brand turns this into a slider-by-slider routine.

About the author

Jeffery LuStudent

Jeffery is a student and longtime puzzle enthusiast who grew up on grid games and brain teasers. He covers strategy and the small optimizations that turn an average score into a great one.